• Why Investor Relations?

    For more than 40 years, the CFA Institute has advocated for efficient capital markets that are ethical, transparent, and provide investor protections. One of the Institute’s guiding principles states: “Investors need complete, accurate, timely and transparent information from securities issuers.”

  • Why InsuranceIR?

    Insurance companies face unique challenges when communicating with investors and InsuranceIR is uniquely suited to help with industry-specific support.

    The primary purpose of this blog is to offer specific ideas on how insurance companies can achieve that objective.

    The supporting pages offer information on InsuranceIR's capabilities and how firm principal Heather J. Wietzel can help your company improve your investor communications.

  • Pages

  • Copyright 2012

Be Forthright to Counter Prevailing Mood

My trips to New York and Chicago over the past two weeks included visits with four industry sell-side analysts (thanks to each for their time).

I also attended Cagney Network’s 2010 Insurance Round Table along with buy-side investors and others with industry or consulting roles.

As I look through my notes, I see only one common theme — uncertainty.

Regardless of background, no one seems to have confidence in the economic outlook.  Those in the financial markets seem the least optimistic.  For the property casualty insurance industry, most see intermittent positives in some business lines. With a few interesting exceptions, most also see some event that dramatically reduces capital as the only way to end the current soft market.  (And no one seriously wants an event of that magnitude because of the human cost!)

Realistically, there are only a handful of companies that might be able to individually reverse the current mood.  I see many of the remainder very tempted to “fly below the radar” until the mood changes.

My advice — don’t.  There is no advantage in letting your company become one more source of uncertainty, even if the going is tough.   Better communications isn’t a way to mask weak performance. But better communications can be used strategically to reduce uncertainty and to bolster management credibility, arguably a company’s most important intangible asset. For those reasons, I recommend that companies:

  • Become more transparent – Give new insights into your long-term business strategies and decision-making
  • Add to your disclosures – Provide more detail (and data) on the drivers of your current results and sources of future opportunity
  • Make management more available – Let more investors hear directly from your leaders
  • Share your vision – Help investors see how the company might perform under best-case and worst-case scenarios and how it is differentiated in the market

SEC Stresses Consistency

I’ll admit I have a tendency to obsess about ways investor relations can leverage time already being invested by a company in other activities. I look for these opportunities because management time is a limited commodity, particularly at smaller companies. And it is at those smaller companies where management involvement in investor communications is most critical.

One of the best opportunities companies have to create efficiencies in the communications process is by being consistent — making strategic use of their required (and time-consuming) SEC filings and leveraging that time to simplify development of other communications. Plus, investors read the SEC filings, and trade on the information they contain. Investors rely on the filings whether or not those documents share the strategic messages contained in presentations, news releases and other written and verbal communications.

I nearly jumped up and down for joy at NIRI’s National Conference when consistency (and IR’s appropriate role in SEC filings) was highlighted in the keynote address given by Meredith Cross, Director, Corporation Finance.

But rather than editorialize, below is a transcription of a section of Director Cross’s speech.  The excerpt includes her segue into the use of non-GAAP data, which is a topic of particular interest to insurance companies.

At the beginning of her remarks, she included the normal SEC disclaimer that these were her beliefs, not necessarily those of the commission.

Follow the link to read what Director Cross said on consistency: Continue reading

Just for Insurance IROs

We have extended the deadline for the insurance IRO perspective assessment* to July 15, so act now.

The assessment takes just a few minutes to complete on line (at no cost). The project is a chance for those of us communicating with insurance investors (update: IROs and others with IR responsibilities) to:

  • Learn about the challenges and opportunities our peers are seeing in 2010 and beyond and how our perceptions compare.
  • Discover ways to leverage our personal strengths, improve our effectiveness and enjoy greater satisfaction in our IR roles.

And for NIRI members, I’m curious if you have any interest in an eGroup for property casualty and life IROs (using the new capabilities on NIRI’s website). Since the conference, there’s been an uptick in eGroup traffic.  A dedicated eGroup might be a useful forum for sharing insights as we deal with our industry’s unusual challenges. I would be happy to set one up, if there is interest.

* The perspective assessment project is being conducted in conjunction with Jeanne Hollister Lebens of JML Coaching LLC. Jeanne is using the ChangeWorks!™ assessment tool to gather the data. (Note that individual responses are confidential although aggregate data may be released, shared or published).

Do Investors See Risk in Your Muni Portfolio?

On June 13, 2010, The Wall Street Journal commented that many municipalities continue to struggle financially, creating risks in the $2.8 trillion municipal bond market. (According to the article, municipal bond prices aren’t yet showing signs of investor concern.)

With few exceptions, property casualty insurance companies hold municipal bonds in their portfolios, in part because many of these bonds are tax advantaged.

With the concerns published widely, insurance companies may want to be ahead of the curve on this topic in their upcoming disclosures and be ready to answer related questions.

Potential additional disclosures include:

  • Separating the breakdown of fixed-maturities portfolio ratings into municipal bonds and corporate bonds (often the information is presented on a consolidated basis).
  • Providing the insured and underlying ratings distribution.
  • Giving details on the geographic distribution of municipal bond holdings.
  • Identifying the portion of the municipal bond portfolio carrying a split rating (different ratings by two or more major rating agencies).

For question and answer sessions, companies can be prepared to describe the actions they have taken to reduce risk in this portion of their portfolio and gather data on holdings they retain in municipalities deemed at greater risk, e.g., Jefferson County, Alabama, or Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Further, investors may be interested in the qualitative screens used to build the portfolio, e.g., bonds supporting essential services.

Bookmark and Share

To Pre-release or Not … That is the Question

My apologies for the length of this post, but this topic is too complex to lend itself to a “short” entry.

Insurance company managements regularly face the decision of whether or not to comment ahead of a regular release date on some item that will cause results for a particular quarter to fall below those previously anticipated (there is an occasional need for an upward adjustment).

The most common topic is catastrophe losses that have risen above a stated expectation, historic average or other measure (this quarter looks like it’s going to be another tough one for weather). These are often released early because one quarter’s catastrophe losses generally give little insight into a company’s long-term outlook (unless that single quarter turns into a quarter-after-quarter stream of higher-than-anticipated losses that indicate poor risk selection, geographic concentrations or other business concerns).

For insurers, another common pre-release subject is externally driven changes in portfolio values, particularly when they may lead to other-than-temporary impairment charges, Regardless of topic, the estimate generally is given as a range to acknowledge the uncertainty of early data.

The format normally is a news release that gives investors the background of the situation and the range of estimates for the measure under discussion. Even companies that do not give formal earnings guidance work within some framework of expectations and can benefit from a pre-release.

After conversations with a few investors who believe that companies benefit when they issue pre-releases, here are some thoughts for consideration (I would be pleased to discuss the topic with you directly in more depth): Continue reading

Wow … NIRI Does It Again

NIRI’s 2010 Annual Conference was fantastic. Excellent speakers, important topics, great networking opportunities and lots of fun.

I feel like I’m “drinking from a fire hose” as I work through the conference material for information most relevant to my insurance audience, but I’ll start posting soon!

In the meantime, I encourage insurance company IROs to spend a few minutes taking the perspective assessment I talked about at the conference (I provided the URL to some people at the conference, but any insurance company IRO is welcome to participate).

The assessment will let those of us communicating with insurance investors:

  • Learn about the challenges and opportunities our peers are seeing in 2010 and beyond and how our perceptions compare.
  • Discover ways to leverage our personal strengths, improve our effectiveness and enjoy greater satisfaction in our IR roles.

Please let me know (via email or blog comment) if you need the URL to access the assessment tool.

Next Generation News Releases?

The investor relations community is seeing a flurry of announcements on new products and ideas in the lead up to NIRI’s National Conference next week.

I’m particularly interested in attending sessions with Nasdaq OMX and Thomson Reuters. Each has announced they are rolling out new tools for “next generation” news release distribution methods.

Insurance companies need to issue lengthy, data intensive releases to meet investor needs. The industry would benefit even more than most from tools that allow enhanced disclosure while improving work flow, reducing the risk of error and saving money!

RAFSA — Good or Bad for Insurance Companies?

RAFSA Dodd-Frank = The Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT.

As far as the proposed regulations pertain to the operation of insurance companies, the summaries I’ve seen conclude that RAFSA (in its current form) should be relatively benign for the insurance industry.

But the Act’s governance provisions, with the related demands on investor communications, may create risks for insurance companies.

For example, the Act is likely to pass with a majority voting standard for directors. In an environment where it is getting tougher to find qualified board members, this may be of particular concern for smaller property casualty insurers.

According to SNL data, insiders own less than 20% of the outstanding shares at 31 of the 52 insurance companies with a market cap below $1.0 billion. The remaining shares split between institutions — which are increasingly likely to take an activist role if they are unhappy with company performance — and individuals — for whom voting patterns have steadily weakened in recent years.

I believe companies can minimize the potential risk by engaging all shareholders through a comprehensive and integrated communications program. As a first step, make sure your communications are reaching all of your investor constituencies, using channels and formats that meet their specifics needs, rather than assuming that a one-size-fits-all approach will keep your company in front of every shareholder.

This is just one challenge of the Act (others also are interesting). Summer is a great time to get a head start of these types of investor communications challenges, because the calendar is just a bit lighter. Waiting until next spring may be a risk.

Bookmark and Share

The Washington View

Earlier today, Jeff Morgan, president of the National Investor Relations Institute (the IR professional organization), spoke to our local chapter. His presentation titled Financial and Regulatory Reform and other Critical IR Issues was a thought-provoking look at relevant items under consideration by Congress and the SEC.

He sees a high likelihood that all companies (not just the big “Wall Street” financial institutions) will be facing a myriad of governance and other changes by fall. Many of the expected changes have a direct bearing on the way investor relations is practiced, making the function even more critical. This is a topic on which I know I’ll be spending more time in coming weeks.

Thanks to Jeff for making time to visit Cincinnati and share his insight.

Bookmark and Share

Professional Development

Let me start with a quick thanks to the visitors who made this past week the busiest since I started blogging in February. I hope you found your visits worthwhile.

Looking ahead, I’m excited about two upcoming “professional development” opportunities.

This week, Jeff Morgan, president of the National Investor Relations Institute (the IR professional organization) is visiting Cincinnati. He will be speaking to our local NIRI chapter about the state of affairs in Washington, at least as it relates to investor relations. You can get a taste on his blog.

In two weeks, I’ll be attending NIRI’s National Conference, which is three full days that are all about investor relations. In general, it is a great chance to network and learn. As an added bonus, there’s an organized opportunity for IROs to gather by industry, which is extra useful for those of us working in the (unique) insurance industry!

Looking at the preliminary conference agenda, I see plenty of strategic topics, lots of “best practices” sessions, including ways to use social media, and opportunities to learn more about evolution in the capital markets.

In the next few days, I’ll be figuring out which sessions will be most valuable for me as well as my insurance industry clients. I’ll also be looking for ideas for future posts.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started